
Nancy Pelosi Stock Performance: What’s Real, What’s Trackers, What You Can Actually Use
Intro
When people search nancy pelosi stock performance, they usually want a simple verdict: outperforms the S&P 500 or not. The reality is messier. Most tracking is based on public disclosure filings, and Pelosi’s office has said she does not personally own stocks and that disclosed trades are marked as spouse transactions. That means the cleanest way to evaluate “performance” is to look at rules-based public trackers built from filings, then judge what is actually replicable given disclosure timing.
Pelosi Portfolio Tracker: Key Metrics (2014-Present)
20.84%
CAGR
1.14
Beta
(Higher Risk)
-37.4%
Max Drawdown
73%
Win Rate
For context on how this compares to other members of Congress, see our analysis of top congressional stock traders.
Tables + Analysis
Table 1: Performance snapshot from a disclosures-based “Nancy Pelosi Strategy”
Source: Quiver Quantitative strategy metrics (backtest start 2014-05-16).
What this tells you: the tracker behaves like a risk-on portfolio with above-market sensitivity (beta above 1). The upside can look great in strong markets, but the drawdown number is your reminder that this is not a low-volatility strategy.
Table 2: Latest disclosed holdings and weights (tracker portfolio)
Source: Quiver “New Portfolio Holdings” update (Sept. 10, 2025).
What stands out: this is basically a mega-cap tech and AI leaning book. That matters because a lot of “Pelosi performance” talk can be explained by being overweight the biggest winners of the last cycle, rather than a mysterious edge.
Top 5 Holdings Concentration
73.67%
AAPL + NVDA + GOOGL + MSFT + AMZN
Nearly 3/4 of portfolio in just 5 stocks
Next 5 Holdings
18.12%
Remaining Long Tail
~8.21%
Table 3: Concentration risk (how much of the portfolio is in a few names)
Source: calculated from the weights above.
So what: if three to five names drive most of the exposure, then “nancy pelosi stock performance” is mostly “how did mega-cap tech do.” For decision-making, this means you should compare it to a tech-heavy benchmark too, not only the S&P 500.
Table 4: Disclosure timing rules that distort “performance” headlines
Sources: Senate Ethics and House Ethics guidance on Periodic Transaction Reports (PTRs).
Bottom line: if a tracker shows strong returns, ask whether that return is measured from the trade date or from when the disclosure becomes public. The second is what most readers can actually act on. For more on how disclosure delays affect real-world returns, see our analysis of congressional stock trading performance after disclosure delays.
Conclusion / Callout
If you want a clean takeaway on nancy pelosi stock performance, treat it like this: most public “Pelosi portfolio” tracking is a disclosures-based strategy that is heavily concentrated in mega-cap tech and influenced by delayed reporting rules. The useful move is not blindly copying. It is using disclosures to spot persistent themes (like tech concentration), then sanity-checking risk (concentration and drawdowns) before you decide whether that exposure fits your portfolio.
Key Takeaway
“Pelosi performance” is largely mega-cap tech performance. Before copying, ask: (1) Is the return measured from trade date or disclosure date? (2) Does this concentration level fit my risk tolerance? (3) Am I just buying QQQ with extra steps?